Hewlett-Packard phasing out US pension plan

HP is phasing out its defined US benefit pension plan, completing the process it started just over a year ago when it closed the plan to new and younger employees.

After Dec. 31, plan participants no longer will earn benefits in the DB plan. Instead, they will be eligible for an enhanced 401(k) plan match. HP's action is the second step the Palo Alto, Calif.-based technology giant has made to wind down the plan. In January 2006, HP closed its pension plan to new and younger employees and offered those individuals a beefed-up 401(k) plan in which the company matches 100% of employees' 401(k) salary deferrals, up to 6% of pay.

Employees whose combined age and service were at least 62 remained in the DB plan and a 401(k) plan in which HP matches 100% of employees' salary deferrals up to the first 3% of pay and 50% of employees' pretax contributions on the next 2% of pay. Starting Jan. 1, 2008, those individuals will move to the enhanced 401(k) plan. HP said the changes are "consistent with actions being taken by many of HP's industry peers and other large corporations." Other companies that have deployed a two-step approach to phase out their defined benefit plans include IBM Corp. of Armonk, N.Y.; NCR Corp. of Dayton, Ohio; and Sears Holding Corp. of Hoffman Estates, Ill.

Mark Hurd said to employees :
" As a result of this decision, we will have a one-time pension curtailment gain of approximately $500 million. We will use the savings from the pension freeze to offer
impacted U.S. employees the option to participate in an Enhanced Early Retirement (EER) program. This is a voluntary program and will be offered to the impacted
employees whose combined age and years of service equals 65 or more.

After the election period ends, we will assess projected program costs based on the number of employees who apply. If the projected costs exceed the accounting gain from freezing the U.S. pension plans, employees will be accepted starting with those that have the highest number of points.

This means that, it's possible, that not everyone who applies for EER may be accepted, which is different than programs we have offered in the past. The changes to the U.S. retirement program are consistent with actions being taken by many of our industry peers and
other large corporations, and will more closely align HP programs with industry-competitive practices. The nature of the treatment of this program has been increasingly
challenging for us to deal with and inhibits our ability to grow. We are therefore making a choice not to continue to differentiate Hewlett-Packard in this area.

About a third of the employees within the United States will be affected and I want to acknowledge the personal impact that this may have. Employees included in this group
will receive further details this week. Additional materials are available on the portal including how to submit a question.

Finally, the benefits received by current U.S. retirees or other active employees will not be affected one bit by today's announcement."

The 100 Top Socially Responsible Companies: Where's Hewlett-Packard ?

San Jose Mercury News Blog

For the first time in the seven-year history of the "Top 100 Corporate Citizens" list, Hewlett-Packard didn't make it.

The list by Corporate Responsibility Officer Magazine includes 15 Silicon Valley companies that are ranked as socially responsible based on data collected by KLD Research & Analytics. If you think about what the pretexting scandal from last year cost HP, this is part of the fallout. After all, spying on your own employees and journalists can't be called "socially responsible" in anybody's book.

Here's what the list makers said about HP:"Missing from the list and from the top 10 for the first time ever is Hewlett-Packard. Like many companies on the list, the Palo Alto, Calif., computer company has an impressive record in giving to the community, creating a diverse, fair workplace and actively protecting the environment. But last year, HP was charged with using illegal methods known as "pretexting," or pretending to be someone else, to investigate leaks of information from the board of directors. Patricia Dunn resigned as Chairman of the Board last September in the wake of the scandal, and HP paid $14.5 million to settle civil charges with the California Attorney General. The company is still under investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission."

HP has a long way to go climb out of the hole it dug : fairness toward employees is one of the criteria....

HP pays $8.6-m bonus to its CEO in a year of scandals

Mercury News

HP Chief Executive Mark Hurd took home more than $19 million during 2006, including one of the largest cash bonuses in Silicon Valley history, the company disclosed Tuesday.

In a year that saw a high-profile boardroom spying scandal and a doubling of the company's profits, Hurd was paid $1.4 million in base salary and an $8.6 million bonus as part of a total compensation package of $19.2 million, not including a grant of 500,000 stock options.

In 2005, Hurd received $24.4 million, including signing and relocation bonuses, along with 1.15 million stock options. Most top HP executives, including Hurd, received fewer restricted stock and option grants and only a slight bump in 2006 salary, but collected bonuses more than double those of previous years. Vyomesh Joshi, executive vice president of HP's Imaging and Printing Group, received a $2.4 million bonus and $1.9 million in stock, vs. a $1 million bonus and $4.1 million in stock in 2005.

``When you see somebody like HP, clearly a thought leader in this area, saying, `We're going to keep salaries at a modest increase, but we're going to allow the team to earn more on the bonus side,' the reasoning behind it is that they're going to be a performance-based culture,'' said compensation expert Steve Patchel of Watson Wyatt.

The rise in cash compensation and drop in stock grants might mean that HP is placing a greater value on short-term performance at the expense of long-term returns, Patchel said. "We are becoming more performance-based with regard to our compensation,'' said HP spokesman Ryan Donovan. "The goal is to tie as much of our top executives' compensation as possible to their performance at the company.'' Donovan declined to comment on the balance of cash bonuses vs. stock grants.

Hurd's $8.6 million cash performance bonus puts him in lofty company. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison received a $6.4 million bonus in 2006 along with his $1 million salary, and a $6.5 million bonus in 2005 on top of a $900,000 salary. Brian Halla, chief executive of National Semiconductor, received a $5.3 million bonus in 2006 on top of his $890,000 salary.

HP's executive pay packages include reimbursement for an annual physical exam, $18,000 in financial counseling and personal use of the company's corporate jets, though they do have to pay tax on aircraft use. HP covers the first 25 hours of Hurd's personal use of HP aircraft, and provides him a mortgage-interest subsidy, on top of a $2.75 million relocation benefit in 2005.
Hurd is credited with turning HP around after taking over in March 2005 from Carly Fiorina, who had been ousted by the board in February. The company's 2006 income was $6.2 billion, compared with $2.4 billion in 2005.

HP's stock price has risen 94 percent since Hurd joined, climbing 38 percent in fiscal 2006 to $38.74. It closed Tuesday at $42.31. The company's market capitalization grew 33 percent to $105.8 billion during 2006. It now stands at $115 billion, up more than 80 percent since Hurd took over.

Around Labor Day, news of HP's spying scandal broke, forcing Hurd and then-board chairwoman Patricia Dunn to combat allegations that HP had hired investigators who used deception to obtain phone records of board members, journalists, employees and others as part of an internal company probe ordered by Dunn into leaks of confidential board meeting.
Dunn, who resigned in late September in the scandal's wake, was paid $155,338 in stock and $18,000 in cash for her board service. The company did not disclose her severance package (if one exists), nor did it disclose possible severance packages for others who resigned in connection with the spying scandal, such as high-profile general counsel Ann Baskins or senior counsel Kevin Hunsaker.