An Open Letter to the Director of HP Corporate Human Resources

An Open Letter to the Director of Corporate Human Resources, Marcela Perez de Alonso, by the Five French Unions :

Marcela,

Our approach may appear unusual, however if the five Unions present within HP France have agreed to address you directly, it is to invoke a disturbing situation which has generated a lot of emotion amongst HP’s French employees, and which unfortunately has not proved to be solvable through usual consultation and negotiation processes.

The radical changes to the Range Setting which sets employee’s paygrade according to Job Function have lead to the following situation in France:

· Mainstream Population: 73.2% of employees suffer a decrease of 1 to 2 paygrades, whilst only 2.7% increase by one paygrade

· Sales Population: 40.7% of employees suffer a decrease of 1 to 2 paygrades whilst only 3.8% increase by one paygrade

This announcement was received as a shock by French employees, and has been difficult to accept for three reasons:

1 - Loss of confidence in the rating mechanism :

Most people accord importance to the Job and Wage architecture as a way to position their value to HP and career progression. Proceeding with such massive paygrade degradations have provoked feelings of personal devaluation, and has directly lead to the mistrust of the job and rating mechanism. It has disappointed HP employees who saw their efforts rewarded in the wage and earnings system. Consequently these massive degradations are undermining employees’ motivation and morale.

2 - France unfairly affected :

Whilst EMEA as a whole is impacted by a drop in paygrades for an average 20% of the workforce, France is affected to the tune of about 60%. What might appear elsewhere as an adjustment to the system, because of the massive scale of degradations in France it is seen by many as a sanction of French employees.

3 - Lack of transparency :

Prior to this new range setting, French HR had always justified the positioning of pay grades in France as being market-compliant. The explanations for the new mechanism of range setting are presented as: "Market research, revision of the “competitive index”, new policies "on the pay grade ranges”. But neither Union Representatives nor their appointed Experts have received communication of the new market research or how they apply to jobs within HP France. This makes the exercise completely opaque, and it is impossible for us to understand or verify. The underlying logic of a very important change to pay market analysis from one fiscal year to another remains totally incomprehensible, and through lack of justification it cannot be serenely embraced by employees.

Faced with this situation, and on several occasions, the French Unions have invoked the frustration and incomprehension expressed by employees, both to HR France (Pierre-Yves Tilly) and to the France Country Manager (Yves de Talhouët). Pressed by employee meetings at all French sites and petitioned by over 1800 signatures, the unions have asked for:

· A moratorium on the application of the new range settings
· The provision of information needed to gain a detailed understanding of the motivations behind the changes in order to be able to discuss in a concerted manner their adaptation to the HP France population.

HR France appears to have understood our arguments and our discontent, and apparently requested to HR Corporate a moratorium on the implementation. However their response is that this has been refused. However, HP France employees have difficulty assimilating these changes, and do not wish to internalise their loss of confidence and hopes, and their frustration. Since no further progress on this issue seems possible in France, we hereby are informing you of the situation in France and ask you formally for a response to our requests:

· A moratorium on the implementation of the measure
· Access to the detailed information which underlay the changes to the range setting system so that we can openly negotiate their application in France.

Finally, we would also ask you to respond to this open letter by explaining directly to french employees the foundation and the benefits of these changes as well as any clarifications that you consider appropriate to address the unhappiness that the measures have provoked.


Best regards,

The Five French Unions.

Employee talks : "Industry benchmark excuses"

"HR, speaking for management, sends out notes each time cuts in benefits, elimination of retirement plans, job re-classifications and even office cube-size reductions are announced. The notes justify the reductions by basically saying, "After careful analysis of what is going on in the market, it was found that HP was being too generous to its employees and is lowering the benefits to be more in line with market conditions."

Interestingly, while externally we are trying to set the industry agenda, internally it oftentimes feels like we are on a race to the bottom of the pack, using industry benchmarks as excuses.

I know it is self-serving to complain about what I have lost and I know that cutting costs in our business is a fact of life for the rest of our lives. Yet, I wonder how much more can be squeezed out of us before the career becomes just a job — and the job is done just according to spec. If my pay and benefits are set by the industry benchmark, should the quantity and quality of the time I spend on the job also be industry-average ? "

HP to Buy Back $8 Billion of Stock

Supreme Court rejects Hewlett-Packard's efforts to block class action suit

AP

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed a class action lawsuit to proceed against Hewlett-Packard Co. that alleges Compaq, now a part of HP, sold defective computers.

The Supreme Court's action lets stand a 2005 ruling by an Oklahoma state court. The case involves a lawsuit by two Oklahoma residents, Stephen and Beverly Grider, who allege that Compaq Computer Corp. sold them a defective computer and didn't repair or replace it, as called for in the company's warranty.

The Griders sued in June 2003 and their lawyers asked the state court to certify a class of 1.7 million people who had bought similar computers. Their request was granted in 2005.
Compaq was purchased by Hewlett-Packard in 2002.

Class action suits allow numerous plaintiffs with similar claims to proceed in a single trial. Businesses usually oppose such designations given the greater damage awards that can result.
Compaq argued in court papers filed with the Supreme Court that a virtually identical lawsuit was brought in Texas in 2000. In that case, the Texas Supreme Court refused to certify a class action, ruling that Texas law shouldn't apply to out-of-state members of the class.

Nevertheless, Oklahoma's highest court not only certified the class, but said that Texas law should be applied in the case because, among other things, Compaq was headquartered in Texas.

Compaq's lawyers said that under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution, which requires states to honor each others' laws and court rulings, Oklahoma shouldn't be able to apply Texas law when Texas' highest court has reached the opposite conclusion.

HP scandal: where are they now?

San Jose Mercury News

The HP spying scandal ruined careers, decimated family businesses and sullied previously sterling reputations. Here is a brief update on the key players:

* Tom Perkins, partner emeritus, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, former HP board member. Perkins blew the whistle on HP's investigation after learning his phone records were obtained by investigators. At press time, he was in Europe on his massive yacht, the Maltese Falcon, with a crew from "60 Minutes." His autobiography, "Valley Boy," is due from Penguin Nov. 5.

* Patricia Dunn, former chair. Hewlett-Packard Dunn initiated two internal investigations into boardroom leaks while chair of HP. She resigned from the board in September 2006. The California attorney general dropped felony charges against her in March. Dunn is spending time with her family, trying to stay healthy and fight cancer. She has also given talks on the lecture circuit.

* George "Jay" Keyworth, former HP board member. Keyworth resigned from HP's board in September 2006, acknowledging that he was the source of an article on CNET about a management retreat to discuss strategy. He is chairman of the Progress & Freedom Foundation, a Washington think tank, and on the board of General Atomics.

* Larry Sonsini, chair, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. As HP's outside counsel, Sonsini interviewed board members about leaks to the press in 2005 for then-CEO Carly Fiorina, and in 2006 his firm was asked by HP to investigate its use of pretexting during the subsequent boardroom leak probes. At the end of last year, he was replaced as HP's outside counsel, though his company still does legal work for HP.

* Ann Baskins, former general counsel HP. After a 24-year-career with HP, Baskins resigned as the company's head attorney on the morning of a congressional hearing in Washington, D.C. Married to a Wilson Sonsini lawyer, Tom DeFilipps, Baskins is not currently practicing as an attorney.

* Kevin Hunsaker, former ethics chief HP. Hunsaker, a lawyer, was the person who ended up running the investigation to uncover the boardroom leak. In June, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Ray E. Cunningham dismissed pretexting charges against Hunsaker after he completed 96 hours of community service during which he worked for the Fair Housing Law Project, a community legal aid service.

* Ron DeLia, Security Outsourcing Solutions of Boston; Matthew DePante, Action Research Group of Melbourne, Fla.; Bryan Wagner, a data broker in Littleton, Colorado. Charges against outside investigators Delia and DePante were dismissed after they performed community service. Wagner pleaded guilty to two felonies; sentencing is set for Oct. 3. DeLia's company is still operating, but the scandal has had a "devastating" personal and financial impact, said his lawyer, John Williams. The DePantes were both "financially and emotionally devastated," said attorney Susy Ribero-Ayala. "They shut down their business. It took a toll on their family."

50.47 $ !!!

Reporters, Family Sue HP in Spy Scheme

FT, AP : "HP's boardroom-spying scandal was back in the spotlight on Wednesday after a group of reporters and their families sued the computer maker over its controversial internal investigation into the identity of a boardroom mole.

Five separate lawsuits claiming "illegal and reprehensible conduct" were filed in San Francisco Superior Court against Palo Alto-based Hewlett-Packard, former Chairwoman Patricia Dunn and Kevin Hunsaker, the company's former ethics chief.

The lawsuits allege invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and engaging in unfair business practices. They seek unspecified damages and a jury trial. "We're filing the lawsuits to make sure this never happens again," said Kevin Boyle, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs.

HP said it apologized to each of the people affected by the spying probe and made a "substantial" settlement offer. "Unfortunately, rather than respond to the offer, they have decided to sue," HP said in a statement. "HP is disappointed by their decision and will defend itself."

The lawsuits come nearly a year after HP disclosed in a Sept. 2006 regulatory filing that investigators used a tactic called "pretexting" -- or pretending to be someone else to obtain private information from companies -- to spy on board members, journalists and their families.
The next month, California's attorney general charged Dunn, Hunsaker and three private investigators with four felony counts each -- including fraud, identity theft and conspiracy.

Those charges were later dropped, with a Santa Clara County judge calling their conduct a "betrayal of trust and honor" that nonetheless did not rise to the level of criminal activity.
Separately, HP agreed to pay $14.5 million in a civil settlement with the state, most of which was slated to fund investigations into privacy rights and intellectual property violations.

The U.S. attorney's office in San Francisco brought charges against one of the investigators, Bryan Wagner, who pleaded guilty to two felony counts of identity theft and conspiracy in the case. His sentencing is set for October in San Jose federal court.

Judge Drops Remaining Charges in HP Case

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -

A Santa Clara County judge dismissed the remaining charges against three defendants in the Hewlett-Packard Co. boardroom spying case Thursday, calling their conduct a "betrayal of trust and honor" that nonetheless did not rise to the level of criminal activity.

Superior Court Judge Ray E. Cunningham followed through on a deal reached in March to drop reduced fraud charges if the defendants -- former HP ethics chief Kevin Hunsaker and private investigators Ronald DeLia and Matthew DePante -- each completed 96 hours of community service. The move ended the state's role in a case that ensnared some of the top officials at the venerable HP, now the world's largest technology company by revenue. A federal investigation is continuing.

Hunsaker and the two private investigators, who had pleaded no contest to misdemeanor charges of fraudulent wire communications, were accused of illegally obtaining the phone logs of directors, journalists and HP employees in an effort to identify board members leaking confidential information to the media. In tossing the misdemeanor charges, Cunningham praised the California attorney general's office for its investigation of HP's ill-fated effort to root out the source of boardroom leaks, but said the defendants' actions were not criminal at the time they occurred.

"At worst, the conduct in this case amounted to boardroom politics and a betrayal of trust and honor, rather than criminal activity," the judge said, according to a transcript of his remarks supplied by the attorney general's office. The judge said the investigation nevertheless "achieved much public good," including helping spur the passage of state and federal legislation specifically outlawing "pretexting," or pretending to be someone else to secretly secure copies of their private telephone logs. In addition, the state reached a $14.5 million civil settlement with HP in December, the bulk of which is slated to fund state and local investigations into privacy rights and intellectual property violations.

Ralph Sivilla, a deputy attorney general, said after the hearing that state prosecutors still think criminal conduct occurred, but that the office was satisfied with this resolution of the criminal case because of the "chilling effect" the HP investigation had on similar sleuthing tactics. Thomas Nolan, one of Kevin Hunsaker's defense lawyers, said the defendants paid a "pretty heavy price" in being prosecuted and that "the people at HP, everyone, felt they were doing the right thing and basically didn't believe they were committing any crime.

"The judge's comments and the ultimate dismissal of the charges backed up that belief, Nolan said after the hearing. Five people, including former HP Chairwoman Patricia Dunn, were originally charged in October with four felony counts in the HP probe: use of false or fraudulent pretenses to obtain confidential information from a public utility; unauthorized access to computer data; identity theft; and conspiracy to commit each of those crimes. Charges against Dunn, who was accused of orchestrating the spying effort, were dropped in March. State charges against private investigator Bryan Wagner were also dropped, but only after he pleaded guilty to two federal felony counts of identity theft and conspiracy in the case. Wagner's sentencing is set for October in San Jose federal court, and the federal probe is ongoing.

HP CEO, CFO, EVP Exercise Options...

In a form filed with the SEC, Mark V. Hurd reported he exercised 100 000 options for $21.73 apiece and then sold 150,000 shares on the same day for $45.25 to $45.86 a piece.

Catherine A. Lesjak, CFO, reported she exercised 11,755 options for $15.75 apiece and then sold a total of 23,490 shares on Thursday and Friday for $45.34 to $45.70 a piece.

Executive VP Shane V. Robinson (strategy and technology officer) exercised options on 125,000 shares for $15.75 to $22.02 a piece. He sold the shares the same day for $45.26 and $45.38 each.

Open market purchases and sales of insiders must be reported within two business days of the transaction.

HP estimates FY07 revenue will be $100 billion

"While we still have considerable work ahead of us, I am confident we can continue to execute with discipline and deliver strong financial returns."

Mark Hurd

Journalists sue over HP spying scandal

journalists targeted in the HP phone tapping scandal are to sue the company for invasion of privacy. Dawn Kawamoto, Stephen Shankland and Tom Krazit have hired Los Angeles law firm Panish, Shea & Boyle which is currently preparing the suit. The three journalists, who all work for CNET's News.com, make up a third of the nine journalists targeted by private investigators.

Lawyer Kevin Boyle said that the trio are not seeking financial restoration, but are asking for punitive measures to be taken against HP. HP began the investigation to try and locate the source of a boardroom leak last year. However, investigators used illegal methods such as obtaining phone records for the journalists and their relatives by deception, otherwise known as pretexting. CNET Networks said that it was not part of the lawsuit but could launch its own action separately.

HP had hoped to settle the case by making a $250,000 donation on behalf of each journalist to a charity of their choice. Felony charges filed in the case against former HP chief executive Patricia Dunn were dismissed. Out of four other defendants facing felony charges, three were eventually charged with misdemeanours. HP has already settled a civil lawsuit filed by California's attorney general for $14.5m (£7.3m).

Federal government joins lawsuits against HP, Sun, Accenture

The U.S. Department of Justice threw its weight behind a whistleblower lawsuit against HP, Sun and Accenture, alleging that the companies violated federal claims laws by improperly charging government agencies for several years' worth of technology contracts.

In documents filed on April 12 and unsealed Thursday, the DOJ alleges that H-P, Sun and Accenture each "solicited and provided improper payments and other things of value," on technology contracts with several U.S. government departments and agencies from the late 1990s to the present.

H-P, Sun and Accenture are charged with making false claims to the U.S. government for work done involving information technology hardware and services contracts. In a statement, the DOJ said it believes that the tech giants engaged in kickbacks and undisclosed conflict-of-interest relationships with other companies with whom they worked on the government contracts. "The defendants have systematically solicited and/or made payments of money and other things of value, known as 'alliance benefits,' to a number of companies with whom they had global 'alliance relationships' or an agreement to work together," the DOJ said, in a statement.

The suit was originally filed in U.S. District Court in Little Rock, Ark., by plaintiffs Norman Rille and Neal Roberts, and under the whistleblower provisions of the U.S. False Claims Act. That act says that a private party can file an action on behalf of the U.S. and receive a portion of any fees recovered in the case. The act also said the U.S. may recover three times the amount of its losses, plus civil penalties, in the case.

H-P released a statement denying the charges and saying it is confident it engaged in appropriate business practices with the government. "We plan to vigorously defend this action and look forward to demonstrating that HP has done nothing wrong," H-P said.

Hewlett-Packard plans further $8 bln share buyback

HP said its board of directors approved an additional $8 billion to buy back company shares.

During its fiscal first quarter ended Jan. 31, the company already bought back some $2.3 billion worth of its shares and had an additional $3.3 billion of authorized funds remaining for future buybacks.

HP said the buyback would help offset dilution created by shares from employee stock option plans and return cash to stockholders, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission...

HP Shareholder Meeting

Shareholders rejected a proposal that would have made it easier for shareholders to field their own candidates during board elections

Another shareholder proposal to separate the roles of the board chairman and the CEO was also defeated.

However, stockholders approved a proposal to require the board to hold a shareholder vote for any future poison pill. Also known as a stockholder rights plan, a poison pill gives a board the right to sell new shares at lower prices as a way to prevent a competing party from acquiring majority interest in the company.

Shareholders also approved a proposal linking senior executive pay to performance. HP had urged shareholders to reject both nonbinding proposals. The company said it is disappointed with the vote but vowed to "review its current policy."

HP-gate : The End ?

What you will find in the comments part :

- Sept 7 : HP said to have spied on reporters
- Sept 8 : California Attorney General says HP tactics violate State laws, but unclear who to prosecute
- Sept 8 : HP's says Dunn will resign if asked by board
- Sept 8 : New York Times, CNET consider options over HP
- Sept 9 : Dunn is done ?
- Sept 11 : Feds and Congress ask for info !
- Sept 12 : HP's Board split over Dunn
- Sept 12 : Patricia Dunn to remain HP Chairman through January 2007 Board meeting and then demoted ! Board appoints Mark Hurd as successor
- Sept 12 : Keyworth says HP approved leaks !!!
- Sept 12 : HP insiders likely to face charges
- Sept 14 : HP spy scandal extends to employees !
- Sept 14 : Reporters 'outraged' over HP tactics
- Sept 15 : HP Execs asked to testify in Washington
- Sept 18 : Shareholder files suit
- Sept 18 : House committee awaits HP documents related to scandal
- Sept 18 : What HP Should Have Done
- Sept 19 : H-P security expert warned on leak probe
- Sept 19 : House committee receives H-P documents
- Sept 20 : House seeks more testimony in H-P case
- Sept 20: H-P considered spying on newsrooms !
- Sept 20: HP Scandal Reaches New Weirdness Level
- Sept 20: Did Mark Hurd approve a "sting" operation on a journalist ?
- Sept 21: H-P's Hurd to hold press conference on scandal sept 22
- Sept 21: HP shares down 5 percent as scandal deepens
- Sept 21: Democrat wants HP CEO to testify on leak scandal
- Sept 21: HP sponsors a privacy award...
- Sept 21: Hurd will testify before House committee sept 28
- Sept 22: Calif AG says no evidence to link HP CEO to crime
- Sept 22 : US Senate nears vote on HP-linked phone data issue
- Sept 22 : Mark Hurd named HP Chairman : Patricia Dunn is leaving Board.
- Sept 23 : HP Chair Resigns Amid Probe Fallout
- Sept 23 : Why Hurd needs to take some questions
- Sept 25 : HP Clears the Air, but Not the Cloud
- Sept 26 : HP Under Increasing Pressure to Overhaul Board
- Sept 26 : HP's most truthworthy man
- Sept 26 : The Men Who Conducted the HP Probe
- Sept 27 : Mark Hurd on the HP scandal
- Sept 28 : House panel releases HP testimony
- Sept 28 : Hypocrisy at Hewlett-Packard(fictional)
- Sept 28 : HP General Counsel Resigns Amid Scandal
- Sept 28 : Lawmakers Grill HP Over Spying Scandal, Making Comparisons to Enron and Watergate
- Sept 29 : HP Whistleblower Tried to Avert Scandal
- Sept 29 : 3 Execs Testify About HP's Spying Probe
- Sept 29 : Hurd: I'm not resigning
- Sept 29 : HP counsel leaves with millions in options, benefits
- Sept 29 : HP Goes to Washington (a tragi-comedy...)
- Sept 29 : Controlling The Damage At HP (everything you wanted to know about Mark Hurd).
- Sept 30 : As H-P scandal reaches peak, Hurd and HPQ are still solid
- Sept 31 : Internal Memo Details Hewlett-Packard Leak Hunt
- Oct 1 : Why Hurd needs to take some questions
- Oct 1 : 4 things HP's Hurd needs to do now
- Oct 2 : HP's costly scandal
- Oct 3 : HP CEO appears secure, but risks remain analysts say.
- Oct 3 : Hurd may have known about phone records in 2005
- Oct 4 : Reporters Reassigned in HP Spy Scandal
- Oct 4 : Indictments in HP case. But not for Mark Hurd.
- Oct 4 : HP's Hurd is contrite, but indictable ?
- Oct 5 : Investigations continue at HP
- Oct 5 : The Silver Lining in HP's Scandal
- Oct 6 : More Charges Possible in HP Spying Probe
- Oct 6 : Is Dunn Really A Felon ?
- Oct 7 : Fiorina could attract interest in HP leak probe
- Oct 8 : HP not alone with "rogue" investigations
- Oct 9 : Dunn calls allegations in HP scandal a 'myth'
- Oct 9 : Dunn said Perkins launched a disinformation campaign against her
- Oct 10 : Fiorina blames divisive HP board
- Oct 11 : Three in HP Scandal Plead Not Guilty
- Oct 14 : Calif. AG presses ahead with HP leak investigation
- Oct 21 : HP tells reporter security firm searched her trash
- Nov 2 : HP CEO responds to Congressional letter : he thought phone records were public...
- Nov 10 : Ex-HP Ethics Chief Pleads Not Guilty
- Nov 15 : Dunn pleads not guilty
- Nov 19 : H-P appoints first new board member since scandal
- Feb 12 : The New Yorker looks into HPGate
- Feb 27 : Ex-HP director laments corporate board trend
- March 1 : Dunn's lawyer blasts Perkins
- March 14 : Judge Drops Charges Against HP's Dunn
- April 24 : HP Ethics Chief Tackles Spying Scandal Aftermath : "the chances are "almost nil" for a repeat of last year's debacle".
- May 24 : Hewlett-Packard probe by SEC is settled

Once upon a time...

HP revealed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it had used "an outside consulting firm" to obtain evidence that showed board member George Keyworth had disclosed information from board meetings to the media. Keyworth admitted he had spoken to the media about confidential board information and was asked to resign.

According the company filing, Keyworth refused to quit, saying that only shareholders could remove him from the board. Venture capitalist and H-P director Tom Perkins then quit in protest over how the Keyworth situation was handled.

The brouhaha grew out an investigation into press leaks that was launched by H-P's nonemployee director, Patricia Dunn, and covered information from meetings that took place both before and after the H-P board fired Fiorina in February 2005 and replaced her with former NCR chief Mark Hurd.

The latest upheaval at the Silicon Valley icon reads like a script from a soap opera...

HP vs. IBM

Hewlett-Packard phasing out US pension plan

HP is phasing out its defined US benefit pension plan, completing the process it started just over a year ago when it closed the plan to new and younger employees.

After Dec. 31, plan participants no longer will earn benefits in the DB plan. Instead, they will be eligible for an enhanced 401(k) plan match. HP's action is the second step the Palo Alto, Calif.-based technology giant has made to wind down the plan. In January 2006, HP closed its pension plan to new and younger employees and offered those individuals a beefed-up 401(k) plan in which the company matches 100% of employees' 401(k) salary deferrals, up to 6% of pay.

Employees whose combined age and service were at least 62 remained in the DB plan and a 401(k) plan in which HP matches 100% of employees' salary deferrals up to the first 3% of pay and 50% of employees' pretax contributions on the next 2% of pay. Starting Jan. 1, 2008, those individuals will move to the enhanced 401(k) plan. HP said the changes are "consistent with actions being taken by many of HP's industry peers and other large corporations." Other companies that have deployed a two-step approach to phase out their defined benefit plans include IBM Corp. of Armonk, N.Y.; NCR Corp. of Dayton, Ohio; and Sears Holding Corp. of Hoffman Estates, Ill.

Mark Hurd said to employees :
" As a result of this decision, we will have a one-time pension curtailment gain of approximately $500 million. We will use the savings from the pension freeze to offer
impacted U.S. employees the option to participate in an Enhanced Early Retirement (EER) program. This is a voluntary program and will be offered to the impacted
employees whose combined age and years of service equals 65 or more.

After the election period ends, we will assess projected program costs based on the number of employees who apply. If the projected costs exceed the accounting gain from freezing the U.S. pension plans, employees will be accepted starting with those that have the highest number of points.

This means that, it's possible, that not everyone who applies for EER may be accepted, which is different than programs we have offered in the past. The changes to the U.S. retirement program are consistent with actions being taken by many of our industry peers and
other large corporations, and will more closely align HP programs with industry-competitive practices. The nature of the treatment of this program has been increasingly
challenging for us to deal with and inhibits our ability to grow. We are therefore making a choice not to continue to differentiate Hewlett-Packard in this area.

About a third of the employees within the United States will be affected and I want to acknowledge the personal impact that this may have. Employees included in this group
will receive further details this week. Additional materials are available on the portal including how to submit a question.

Finally, the benefits received by current U.S. retirees or other active employees will not be affected one bit by today's announcement."

The 100 Top Socially Responsible Companies: Where's Hewlett-Packard ?

San Jose Mercury News Blog

For the first time in the seven-year history of the "Top 100 Corporate Citizens" list, Hewlett-Packard didn't make it.

The list by Corporate Responsibility Officer Magazine includes 15 Silicon Valley companies that are ranked as socially responsible based on data collected by KLD Research & Analytics. If you think about what the pretexting scandal from last year cost HP, this is part of the fallout. After all, spying on your own employees and journalists can't be called "socially responsible" in anybody's book.

Here's what the list makers said about HP:"Missing from the list and from the top 10 for the first time ever is Hewlett-Packard. Like many companies on the list, the Palo Alto, Calif., computer company has an impressive record in giving to the community, creating a diverse, fair workplace and actively protecting the environment. But last year, HP was charged with using illegal methods known as "pretexting," or pretending to be someone else, to investigate leaks of information from the board of directors. Patricia Dunn resigned as Chairman of the Board last September in the wake of the scandal, and HP paid $14.5 million to settle civil charges with the California Attorney General. The company is still under investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission."

HP has a long way to go climb out of the hole it dug : fairness toward employees is one of the criteria....

HP pays $8.6-m bonus to its CEO in a year of scandals

Mercury News

HP Chief Executive Mark Hurd took home more than $19 million during 2006, including one of the largest cash bonuses in Silicon Valley history, the company disclosed Tuesday.

In a year that saw a high-profile boardroom spying scandal and a doubling of the company's profits, Hurd was paid $1.4 million in base salary and an $8.6 million bonus as part of a total compensation package of $19.2 million, not including a grant of 500,000 stock options.

In 2005, Hurd received $24.4 million, including signing and relocation bonuses, along with 1.15 million stock options. Most top HP executives, including Hurd, received fewer restricted stock and option grants and only a slight bump in 2006 salary, but collected bonuses more than double those of previous years. Vyomesh Joshi, executive vice president of HP's Imaging and Printing Group, received a $2.4 million bonus and $1.9 million in stock, vs. a $1 million bonus and $4.1 million in stock in 2005.

``When you see somebody like HP, clearly a thought leader in this area, saying, `We're going to keep salaries at a modest increase, but we're going to allow the team to earn more on the bonus side,' the reasoning behind it is that they're going to be a performance-based culture,'' said compensation expert Steve Patchel of Watson Wyatt.

The rise in cash compensation and drop in stock grants might mean that HP is placing a greater value on short-term performance at the expense of long-term returns, Patchel said. "We are becoming more performance-based with regard to our compensation,'' said HP spokesman Ryan Donovan. "The goal is to tie as much of our top executives' compensation as possible to their performance at the company.'' Donovan declined to comment on the balance of cash bonuses vs. stock grants.

Hurd's $8.6 million cash performance bonus puts him in lofty company. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison received a $6.4 million bonus in 2006 along with his $1 million salary, and a $6.5 million bonus in 2005 on top of a $900,000 salary. Brian Halla, chief executive of National Semiconductor, received a $5.3 million bonus in 2006 on top of his $890,000 salary.

HP's executive pay packages include reimbursement for an annual physical exam, $18,000 in financial counseling and personal use of the company's corporate jets, though they do have to pay tax on aircraft use. HP covers the first 25 hours of Hurd's personal use of HP aircraft, and provides him a mortgage-interest subsidy, on top of a $2.75 million relocation benefit in 2005.
Hurd is credited with turning HP around after taking over in March 2005 from Carly Fiorina, who had been ousted by the board in February. The company's 2006 income was $6.2 billion, compared with $2.4 billion in 2005.

HP's stock price has risen 94 percent since Hurd joined, climbing 38 percent in fiscal 2006 to $38.74. It closed Tuesday at $42.31. The company's market capitalization grew 33 percent to $105.8 billion during 2006. It now stands at $115 billion, up more than 80 percent since Hurd took over.

Around Labor Day, news of HP's spying scandal broke, forcing Hurd and then-board chairwoman Patricia Dunn to combat allegations that HP had hired investigators who used deception to obtain phone records of board members, journalists, employees and others as part of an internal company probe ordered by Dunn into leaks of confidential board meeting.
Dunn, who resigned in late September in the scandal's wake, was paid $155,338 in stock and $18,000 in cash for her board service. The company did not disclose her severance package (if one exists), nor did it disclose possible severance packages for others who resigned in connection with the spying scandal, such as high-profile general counsel Ann Baskins or senior counsel Kevin Hunsaker.

Worth reading : HP IG Metall Standpunkt !

HP-IG Metall December 2006 Newletter

You will find the english "best of" in the comments :
- Downsizing at HP
- Offshoring
- Global delivery
- Nearshoring
- Everyday office life
- Sales commissions
...

HP Paid for Dell Plans, Ex-Employee Says

Jan. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Hewlett-Packard Co. paid to obtain information from a former head of a Dell Inc. unit about Dell's plans to enter the printer market, a former Hewlett-Packard executive said in court papers.

SEC Delays Decision On Board Nominations

WASHINGTON (Los Angeles Times)

The Securities and Exchange Commission Monday said it would not intervene in a dispute over board election rules at Hewlett-Packard Co. and signaled that a clear policy governing director nomination contests probably would not be implemented until the 2008 season of corporate meetings.

"In the short term, the SEC decision to steer clear of the Hewlett-Packard conflict means the Palo Alto-based technology firm might face a greater risk of being sued if it excludes from its annual meeting in March the election resolution submitted by a group of large public pension funds. The measure would change the company's election rules so that investors who own 3% or more of the stock for at least two years would be able to place nominees on the company's official election materials.

The proposal follows disclosures last year that HP hired private investigators to spy on reporters and its own directors to find the source of a leak to the media. HP had asked the SEC to let it keep the election measure off its 2007 corporate ballot, but on Monday the SEC said its staff would keep quiet on the matter.Having been denied explicit permission to exclude the measure, HP officials run the risk of drawing a legal challenge if they do so." We're prepared to litigate," said Richard Ferlauto, director of pension and benefit policy for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, one of the groups pushing the proposal. The SEC decision, he maintained, amounted to a "green light" for shareholder election proposals.

HP had no comment Monday on the SEC decision, said Ryan J. Donovan, a company spokesman. The ball is in HP's court now," Borrus said. "The company will have to think long and hard about its next step. Any move to try to boot out the shareowner access proposal would likely be litigated in court. " Shareholder activists, including many pension funds, have long sought greater influence in the director nomination process, which is largely controlled by management and the board. Big-business lobbies have opposed the effort to loosen up elections, saying that such a step could empower special interests whose agenda is more narrow than that of ordinary shareholders.

The subject of shareholder voting rights is one of the most contentious issues in the area of corporate governance. The SEC has been unable to resolve the matter. In the coming months, he said, the SEC would consider the legal issues surrounding the matter, aiming for "one clear rule to protect investors' interests in all jurisdictions during the next proxy season."

HP CEO denies 'bullet dodging' with stock sale

A pair of Democratic congressman from Michigan are asking Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd to explain why he cashed in more than a $1 million worth of stock options just before a scandal concerning boardroom leaks became public.

In their letter, which was written on Dec. 12 and released this week, U.S. Reps. John Dingell and Bart Stupak, who sit on a panel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that is investigating the Palo Alto, Calif. company, wrote to Hurd to explain the $1.37 million transaction. "In that regard, it appears from the enclosed chart on HP executive trading, that you voluntarily cashed in $1.37 million worth of options on August 25, 2006, the very same day that you were questioned by Wilson Sonsini attorneys who were 'investigating the investigation,'" the two congressman wrote in the letter.

The letter indicates that Hurd cashed in his stock options just before a Sept. 6 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange first detailed that the company had started a far-ranging probe to find the source of leaks from the company's boardroom to various media organizations. On Dec. 14, an HP spokesperson told eWEEK: "This is not a new matter and we look forward to responding to the committee's inquiry."

In their letter, Dingell and Stupak question the timing of the stock sale. The two congressmen write that there has been a number of "backdating" scandals at large companies, which "have raised questions about whether executives are cashing in ('bullet dodging') while in possession of potentially damaging material facts that shareholders do not know." The letter asks for a response from Hurd and HP by Dec. 21.

Hurd said in his anwer that the sale was prearranged and part of an ongoing investment strategy. He wrote that the sale of 100,000 shares on August 25 represented only 5 percent of his HP holdings and noted that Wall Street had yet to punish the company's stock over the spying scandal.

"HP's stock has risen by more than $5 per share since the date of the trade," Hurd wrote in the letter. "My August trade was not a case of bullet-dodging."

Here is Mark Hurd answering letter !